I'm sure those of
you who follow me on social media are aware that I spent the last two
months overseas, two weeks of which I was privileged to spend with a
charity called working families.
My desk at working families :) |
My
initial thoughts about the charity were that they would provide legal
advice to all those who called on their hotline [0300
012 0312 ]
however I quickly discovered their efforts were far greater and more
diverse. Within the two weeks that I spent there I helped organize
networking events, think tanks, policy presentations and research
compositions. It was a massive variety and I can only say that the
members within the office of working families had an adept ability to
switch from paper work to practical work. I found my self constantly
amazed by their empathy, communication and legal knowledge.
Continuously the members were grounded, practical and realistic as
they dealt with the problems of the modern workplace.
Some of the
general issues included:
- Helping with employer/employee relations
- Explaining rights to leave, sick leave and other benefits
- Analyzing potential discrimination cases
- Assisting individuals in continuing work place progression
- Decoding some of the work-related benefits
Those who live in
any country where benefit schemes are enforced will know their
complex nature. Yet Working Families manages to decode some of the
broader issues of the new welfare policy Universal Credit
[http://www.workingfamilies.org.uk/articles/869/]. At a policy
presentation Working Families stood for the ability of low income
families to have access not only to jobs but to quality child care.
Too often hard
working employees are forced to turn down jobs that offer them more
responsibility and pay because the jobs have less flexibility and
mean that individuals lose out on benefits. This benefit loss can
have the consequence of costing more than they are earning.
Unfortunately research [http://www.bbc.com/news/business-35475350]
shows the startling truth that Universal Credit is dropping off key
benefits and losing that practical aspect of welfare.
Key reasons that
families lose money is because;
- Child care is too expensive
- They lose flexibility increasing the need for extra care
- Often gain expenses like eating out and more travel
Additionally
without support families may face;
- increased levels of stress
- decreased time together
- Higher levels of anxiety
- relationship/life dissatisfaction
Interestingly one
of the conferences I attended with Working Families highlighted that
money was not the only factor influencing a families' ability to
progress up a career ladder. After several focus groups the
culmination of the responses revealed that families are craving more
family time. Money is no longer a driving force of work. Yes it's a
relevant factor but the study revealed that if more money sacrificed
time with each other- progression in terms of pay increase loses out.
This need to spend
time with family should not be looked upon as a factor of 'laziness'.
Families, particularly those in financial hardship, often pull close
together and form strong bonds. These relationships are vital for
children to build strong foundations as they move into the future and
for the healing of sick relatives. Some families are also facing the
potential loss of sick relatives, meaning that money is not as
valuable as time.
In this modern
world we are seeing an increased value upon time, particularly time
that can be spent with those we love. Working Families is striving to
work with both employers and employees asa vital middle man that can
strike up the right balance between the two.
The universal
credit scheme was invented to produce a welfare scheme that did not
punish individuals for being out of work. It attempts to understand
the new value of family time and the issues face the 'sandwich'
generation, where families are both caring for children and sick or
elderly relatives. While it attempts to ensure that nobody will live
off welfare for longer than necessary it supports the often tiresome
and difficult transition between welfare and work. This is beneficial
because;
- Provides families with some respite when in financial trouble
- Allows families to care without bringing in external help which can be expensive
- Prevents individuals from being exploited while searching for a job
- Provides people with dignity and pride
- Allows for families to save while progressing through below minimum wage jobs and support themselves in an emergency rather than falling back to where they were
On welfare it is
difficult to save money therefore giving people the opportunity to
earn a little more as their welfare slowly decreases allows
individuals to save some money. Savings provide financial security
and comfort – which has been proven in the past to make people feel
more comfortable and to stress less.
Multiple times I
have discussed the impact of stress on the body. It not only causes
many expansive physiological issues such as adrenal, heart and liver
failure. These issues can tax already over worked families, causing
child carers, sick carers or vulnerable individuals greater issues.
Stress has also
been linked to psychological issues and outbursts. Anxiety, clinical
depression and disorders such as schizophrenia or bi-polar are
frequently connected to high stress levels. It is clear that stress
can be minimized when fiscal stability is present. Although it is not
the only factor in these issues.
The use of fiscal
stability refers to the presence of these factors
- Ability to pay bills as and when they fall due
- The ability to afford food that is of reasonable quality
- The ability to pay for some extra curricular costs such as eat-out food, entertainment or luxury service (massage, facial)*
- To be comfortable with financial ability to prepare or repair any necessity equipment such as laundry machine, dish washing machine or light bulbs
- Some ability to save (eg. To save 10% of earning) and still pay bills
* For families
with children this is especially important because young children
often like to participate in extra curricular classes such as dance,
basketball, surfing or martial arts. These classes can tax
financially strained families, sometimes causing social awkwardness
for young children. While it is understandable that there must be
some cuts to extracurricular activities it's reasonable to allow
every person the opportunity to relax through one non-necessity
service.
It is undoubted
that if England wishes to encourage progression they must inspire
financial stability. Financial stability is the way to encourage
individuals to aspire. Unless the general populace feels that by
accepting a job with higher levels of responsibility and better pay
they will not lose out but gain valuable experience and satisfaction
there will never be any progression. Other countries have also
witnessed higher levels of productivity when minimum wage is at a
'living' level.
The steadtler pens in the top left corner actually became very popular around the office |
I would encourage
young aspiring lawyers and current legal professionals to explore the
website [http://www.workingfamilies.org.uk/] and consider becoming a
Change Maker or registered donor today. The charity is constantly
expanding the areas in which it works – working as a empathetic
policy union that promotes for the well being of employees and
employers rather than higher pay and lesser hours. It's difficult to
summarize the exact issues that Working Families deals with because
they are so dynamic and do respond quickly to the changing issues
within the work place.
Uniquely the
charity is also recognizing the growing paternal expectations for
young fathers. Some closely related organizations that Working
Families has connected with researched the growth in child-minding
fathers. It was found that while women are still predominantly the
primary carers, males were taking a larger interest in the primary
care role for children. Currently men are limited in their ability to
take over this role as prejudice is beginning to turn away from women
and back towards men. Although males were noted to spend more time
doing 'fun' things with children while women completed more domestic
tasks.
In a study by
[https://aifs.gov.au/publications/family-matters/issue-37/achieving-family-supportive-workplace-and-community]
it was discovered that women felt more able to disrupt their working
day to tend to a sick child then men. After further investigation it
was concluded that often the work place culture was the leading
factor in this feeling. While corporations may present a face of
gender equality the reality for many males is that when they disrupt
work for a child they often feel that their work is at risk.
Working Families
is still trying to explore the extent of this cultural phenomenon. I
hope soon I will be able to revisit the topic and provide a more
comprehensive analysis of the new work-place prejudice. Although
perhaps soon with support of Working Families the picture will
present more equality and less gender bias for in this day and age
woman are no longer primary carers, they are merely one of the two
primary carers.
Lulu Hensman
Lulu Hensman
No comments:
Post a Comment